Today’s uncertain environment has prompted many board members to take on more operational roles, which can be disruptive to the leadership teams executing the work. Leaders who diagnose what’s driving the board’s overreaching behaviour, rebuild clarity with their own teams, and put simple communication structures in place can stop drift before it becomes dysfunction. When everyone is clear on their role, the board shifts from bottleneck to strategic partner, freeing the leadership team to lead with confidence, focus, and speed.
Chairs today must mediate increasingly divergent stakeholder demands while guiding boards through technological disruption and societal scrutiny. Traditional leadership traits such as strategic acumen and executive experience now matter less than the ability to synthesize vast amounts of information, reconcile contradictions, and facilitate constructive dialogue. Today’s effective chairs foster a culture of learning on the board, creating psychological safety and encouraging open, respectful debate among directors. To make sure the board balances expert insight with broad participation, chairs also conduct rigorous skills audits and provide structured feedback to directors.
ACNC self-evaluation tool aims to help charities assess whether they are meeting their obligations, and to identify issues that may prevent them from doing so.
The self-evaluation poses questions and prompts you to describe the practical steps your charity is taking to meet its obligations and to list the relevant policies or procedures it has.
Heidi, an FPA Alumni, highlights the ethical and governance issues when a board chair seeks to become the CEO. Drawing from her own experience, she stresses the importance of clear policies, such as a cooling-off period before board members can apply for staff roles. She advocates for transparent CEO performance management, strong governance, and a culture that prioritizes ethical decision-making over individual ambition. Ultimately, Heidi emphasizes that good governance is essential to maintaining integrity and serving the community effectively
Read more here
Tender writing can feel overwhelming, but staying organised helps.
Understand guidelines fully, plan enough time, involve staff early, and get support letters in advance. Show value for money with clear outcomes and data. Repeat key points for assessors, use program logic and risk plans, and always proofread. Keep responses clear, concise, and evidence-based to improve your chances.
Read more here
Research based on 90 interviews and numerous board observations reveals that it’s not the volume but the timing and structure, what the authors call “board synchronisation”, that shapes a successful CEO-board relationship.
Concise briefs, sharing the spotlight in meetings, and personally leading focused debriefs, CEOs can prevent power imbalances and trust breakdowns.
Read more here
The role of non-executive directors is crucial as companies grow, but long tenures can reduce independence and lead to complacency. While some argue for term limits, such as the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority’s proposal for a 10-year cap in certain sectors, others highlight the value of experience gained over time. Research shows directors with tenures of 9-17 years can still contribute effectively, but those with over 25 years may become less effective. Instead of term limits, regularly assessing all directors’ performance may be a better approach to ensure effectiveness.
READ MORE HERE
The debate over compensating directors in the not-for-profit (NFP) sector is growing as governance complexities and time demands increase. The AICD’s 2023-24 Governance and Performance Study reports that 21% of NFP directors are now paid, up from 14% five years ago, but most remain unpaid.
Rising regulatory requirements, especially in sectors like aged care, are pushing some boards to consider remuneration to attract skilled professionals and improve governance. Advocates argue that paying directors can enhance accountability and diversity, particularly for those with lived experience.
Research shows that employees, customers, and investors favor organisations that address social and community issues. Boards need to assess if a stance aligns with their mission and values, considering stakeholder opinions and potential risks. Using a stakeholder governance framework and a risk management approach is essential to evaluate the impact of their position. Communication should be genuine, aligned with the organisation’s purpose, and not used to divert attention from other issues.
The Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD), in collaboration with the Human Technology Institute (HTI) at University of Technology Sydney, has launched a comprehensive suite of resources aimed at equipping directors and boards with the necessary tools to navigate the complexities of Artificial Intelligence (AI).
These resources address the potential benefits and risks associated with AI, emphasising the need for effective oversight and integration within organisational strategies with the aim to empower directors to harness AI’s transformative potential while safeguarding against potential harms.